Question 4
Context: So, the new square has double the area of the original square, because the original square is made up of two small triangles, while the new square is made up of four small triangles.
Q. Moreover, all these small triangles are congruent to each other. Can you explain why?

- A square of side length has an area of . Dividing it along one diagonal creates two right-angled isosceles triangles with legs and hypotenuse .
- A new square with double the area () has side length . When divided by its two diagonals, it forms four right-angled isosceles triangles with legs equal to half the diagonal length () and hypotenuse equal to the outer side ().
- Since all small triangles from both squares have the exact same side lengths (), they are congruent by the SSS (or SAS) congruence criterion.
Step 1 · Analyze Triangles in the Original Square
Let the side length of the original square be .
A diagonal divides the square into two right-angled triangles with legs of length .
By Pythagoras theorem
Thus, each of the two triangles has sides of length and angles .
Step 2 · Analyze Triangles in the New Square
The new square has double the area of the original square, so its area is .
Let the side length of the new square be
The diagonals of a square are equal and bisect each other at
Each of the four triangles formed by the diagonals has:
- Two legs equal to half the diagonal length:
- Angle between the legs:
- Hypotenuse equal to the side of the new square:
Thus, each of the four triangles also has sides of length and angles .
Step 3 · Establish Congruence
Comparing the small triangles from both squares:
- The two triangles in the original square have side lengths .
- The four triangles in the new square have side lengths .
Since corresponding sides of all six triangles are equal in length, all small triangles are congruent to each other by the SSS (Side-Side-Side) congruence rule (or SAS rule, since each has legs of length with an included angle of ).
All the small triangles are congruent to each other by the SSS (or SAS) rule because they are all right-angled isosceles triangles with identical side lengths and .
- Assuming Doubled Area Means Doubled Side Length: Doubling the area scales the side length by , not by .
- Confusing Legs with Hypotenuse: In the original square, the square's side forms the legs of the small triangle, while in the new square, the square's side forms the hypotenuse of the small triangle.
More questions in IT
How can one construct a square having double the area of a given square?
Why does the new dotted square have double the area of the original square?
In many of the constructions in the Śulba-Sūtra, it is desirable to construct, where needed, what Baudhāyana calls ‘east-west’ and ‘north-south’ lines, i.e., horizontal and vertical lines that are perpendicular to each other. Can you draw some horizontal and vertical lines to see why the new square has double the area of the original square? You could draw some horizontal and vertical lines as shown on the right.
Why should the extension of the vertical and horizontal sides of the original square pass through the vertices of the dotted square?
[Hint: From the diagonal property of a square, the line that bisects an angle passes through the opposite vertex. Argue why the vertical and horizontal sides of the original square bisect the two angles of the dotted square.**]
Context: So, the new square has double the area of the original square, because the original square is made up of two small triangles, while the new square is made up of four small triangles.
Q. Moreover, all these small triangles are congruent to each other. Can you explain why?
Now suppose we are given a square, and we want to construct a square whose area is half that of the original square. How would you do it?
Why is the smaller inside square half the area of the larger square?
Again, adding some east-west and north-south lines can explain it:
Why is a square? Why is its area half that of the original paper?
Explain by connecting and , finding the different angles formed, and then using tringle congruence.
Find the hypotenuse of this isosceles right triangle.
What is the value of ?
Is less than or greater than 1?
Is less than or greater than 2?
Can we find closer bounds for ?
Will we ever get a number with a terminating decimal representation whose square is 2?
If there is such a terminating decimal starting with whose square is 2, then it must have a non-zero last digit. If this is the case, then the decimal representation of its square will also have a non-zero last digit after the decimal point. For example, if is of the form , then its square will be of the form—
Use this formula to check your answers in the Figure it Out on page 39.
What if we wish to combine two squares of 'different' sizes to make a large square whose area is the sum of the two smaller squares?
Why does Baudhāyana’s method work?
Can you see why the method works in the case where the two squares are the same size? Does it agree with the method we used earlier to combine two same sized squares into a bigger square?
Explain why all the angles of this new 4-sided figure are right angles and so it is a square.
List down all the Baudhāyana triples with numbers less than or equal to 20.
Is there an unending sequence of Baudhāyana triples?
Is a Baudhāyana triple?
Is a Baudhāyana triple?
Context: The list of Baudhāyana triples having numbers less than or equal to 20 contains the following triples — , , , .
Q. Do you see any pattern among them?
Context: All these triples can be obtained by multiplying each term of by a certain positive integer.
Q. Can we form a conjecture on Baudhāyana triples based on this observation?
Context: Conjecture: is a Baudhāyana triple, where is any positive integer.
Q. Is this true?
Is a primitive Baudhayana triple? What are the other primitive Baudhayana triples with numbers less than or equal to ?
Generate 5 scaled versions of each of these primitive triples. Are these scaled versions primitive?
If is non-primitive, and the integers have — greater than 1 — as a common factor, then is a Baudhayana triple? Check this statement for . Justify this statement.